IAQschool.Online - Docs

Final Guidelines for the Protection and Training of Workers Engaged In Maintenance and Remediation Work Associated with Mold 26 3.0 REFERENCES American Industrial Hygiene Association. (2004). Assessment, remediation, and post-remediation verification of mold in buildings.AIHA Guideline 3 – 2004. Fairfax, VA: AIHA. American National Standards Institute. (2001).Criteria for accepted practices in safety, health, and environmental training. ANSI Z-490.1-2001. Des Plaines, IL: American Society of Safety Engineers. Health Canada. (1995, June). Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: A Guide to Recognition and Management . Federal-Provincial Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health, Environmental Health Directorate. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [Online]. Available: http://www.hc- sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/air_quality/pdf/fungal.pdf Health Canada. (2004). Fungal Contamination in Public Buildings: Health Effects and Investigation Methods . Federal-Provincial Committee on Environmental and Occupational Health, Environmental Health Directorate. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [Online]. Available: http://www.hc- sc.gc.ca/hecs-sesc/air_quality/pdf/fungal_contamination.pdf Morey, P. & Hunt, S. (1995). Mold contamination in an earthquake damaged building. Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 95. pp.1377-1380. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (2003). Health Hazard Evaluation Report: Somerset County Assistance Office, Somerset, PA. (No. HETA #2001-0067-2896). Cincinnati, OH: Goe, S., Park, J., Choe, K., Akpinar-Elci, M., & Kreiss, K. OSHA. (2003, Oct.14). A brief guide to mold in the workplace. Directorate of Science, Technology and Medicine. SHIB 03-10-10. [online] Available: http://www.osha.gov/dts/shib/shib101003.html Rautiala, S., Reponen, T., Hyvarinen, A. et al. (1996). Exposure to airborne microbes during the repair of moldy buildings. Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 57:279-284. Venkatesan, P., Perfect, J.R., & Myers, S.A. (2004, Jan.) Evaluation and management of fungal infections in immunocompromised patients. Dermatologic Therapy. 18.1: 44.

• Cover
• LIST OF TABLES
• LIST OF FIGURES
• PREFACE
• ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
• 1.0 INTRODUCTION
• 1.1 Background
• 1.2 Purpose
• 1.3 Scope
• 1.4 Basic Principles
• 2.0 GUIDANCE ON TRAINING DEVELOPMENT
• 2.1 Basic format and approach
• 2.2 Needs assessment
• 2.2.1 Characterization of the training audiences
• 2.2.2 Characterization of potential exposures and adverse health effects
• 2.2.3 What trainees are required to know and do
• 2.2.4 Job analyses and levels of remediation work
• 2.2.5 Site specific information
• 2.2.6 Special trainee abilities
• 2.2.7 Previous training provided to the trainees
• 2.2.8 Regulatory requirements and existing guidance
• 2.3 Learning objectives and prerequisites
• 2.3.1 Description of learning objectives
• Learning objectives for the courses
• 2.4 Course design
• 2.4.1 Content
• 2.4.1.1 Respirators and personal protective equipment
• Gloves
• Eye protection
• Full-body coveralls
• Respirators for remediation workers
• 2.4.1.2 Maintenance worker training content
• 2.4.1.3 Mold remediation worker training
• 2.4.2 Delivery methods
• 2.4.3 Time allocation
• 2.4.4 Evaluation strategy
• 3.0 REFERENCES
• 4.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY
• 5.0 APPENDICES
• Appendix A. List of Participants from January 2004 Manhattan Workshop
• Appendix B. Work Shop Agendas
• Appendix C. Principles of Adult Education